🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."