🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned decision, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to implement a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include as many as five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three order, issued on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to lift a district court's ruling that had rejected the new map in November.

Justices' Explanation

The federal judge erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and upsetting the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its action.

The federal court had determined that Texas had probably sorted voters by their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to employ the boundaries drawn after the 2020 census for the upcoming election.

Strong Dissent

Through a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's action. She contended that it disregarded the work of the district court, pointing out that its decision was crafted by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a violation of the constitution.

National Redistricting Battle

The ruling occurs during a national battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to protect a narrow Republican control. Ordinarily, map-drawing occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a series of events among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that could add a number of more conservative seats. The opposition, for their part, have countered with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State AG welcomed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures representation supportive of Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

In contrast, Democratic leaders criticized the outcome. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A leading Democratic leader argued the court had another time shredded its credibility by upholding a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.